The end of the Brexit transition period will bring sweeping changes to the UK farming sector in one of the largest policy shifts the industry has seen in decades, the government has announced.
Under than plans, farmers in England “will need to cut carbon emissions, create more space for wildlife and make improvements to animal welfare in order to access public money” after the UK leaves the EU and its common agricultural policy next year, The Independent reports.
Environment Secretary George Eustice told BBC Breakfast this morning that the shift towards more environmentally friendly and sustainable farming practices “will be an evolution not a revolution”.
“If we work together to get this right, then a decade from now the rest of the world will want to follow our lead,” he added.
What is the government proposing?
Between next year and 2028, Downing Street will gradually phase out the “direct payments” per hectare handed to farmers under the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy, which total £1.8bn a year in England. Instead, the money will be used to fund a new “environmental land management” (ELM) scheme.
Eustice told Sky News that the post-Brexit strategy would free farmers in England from the “constraints” of the EU’s controversial system.
During a visit to a farm in East Sussex on Sunday, the environment secretary told reporters that the bloc’s approach was about “rewarding land area rather than what’s done for the environment”. But with Brexit just around the corner, Britain’s “future agriculture policy is going to reward farmers for doing things to reduce climate change and carbon impact”, he added.
The money saved from reducing the current subsidies will be used to pay farmers “to harness their land to protect wildlife and boost carbon stocks through actions such as tree planting and restoring soils”, The Independent reports.
Farmers will also “be supported to improve animal welfare, and the change could see them being paid for reducing the use of cages and crates used in poultry and pig farming, and ending practices such as beak trimming and tail-docking”, adds The Telegraph.
And further public money will be available to help them improve their profitability through “hi-tech and sustainable farming methods”, the newspaper continues.
Alternatively, existing farmers who want out will be offered lump-sum “exit payments”, in a bid to bring “new blood” into the sector, says The Times.
These payments will allow anyone who has had enough of farming to retire “with dignity”, said Eustice, and pave the way for new entrants to the industry who can “bring to the farm something new, different and fresh”.
The Welsh and Scottish administrations will decide separately how to allocate their farm funding.
And the reaction?
Campaigners have “broadly welcomed” the shift towards prioritising the environment, but warn that key details still remain “murky”, reports The Independent.
Some “have concerns about the funding and timescale of the new scheme, as farmers are heavily dependent on the subsidy payments to remain profitable”, says Sky News.
The National Farmers Union (NFU) has described the current direct payments as a “lifeline” for agricultural workers facing changing prices and increasingly unpredictable growing conditions.
“Expecting farmers to run viable, high-cost farm businesses, continue to produce food and increase their environmental delivery, while phasing out existing support and without a complete replacement scheme for almost three years, is high risk and a very big ask,” said NFU president Minette Batters.
“I am worried. If you take livestock as an example, you’ve got a 60% to 80% shortfall in farm business income by 2024.”
Mark Bridgeman, president of the Country Land and Business Association, said the new scheme had the potential to “be a genuinely world-leading policy”, but added: “Many farmers will find it hard to see past the drastic cuts to the basic payment scheme, that begin next year.
“The average family farm will see cuts of over 50% before the new schemes are fully available in 2024.”
Why so slow?
The slow rollout of the new policy has infuriated environmentalists, who point out that the farming sector which has not seen a reduction in emissions for more than a decade, with agriculture accounting for 9% of the UK’s output.
Tom Lancaster, head of land use policy at the RSPB, said “faster progress is now needed over the coming months as the government sets out its plans in more detail”.
That plea was echoed by Craig Bennett, from the Wildlife Trusts, who claims that the EU Common Agricultural Policy has “wreaked devastation on our wildlife” and caused “deep-seated issues in farming communities”.
“Nature needs the help promised by this government and we cannot afford to waste any more time,” Bennett said.
Meanwhile, Dr Richard Benwell, CEO of Wildlife and Countryside Link, has called for greater transparency by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) about the policy change plans.
“Combined with uncertainty for farmers over exports, tariffs and standards in trade deals post-Brexit, there’s a foggy future for farming ahead,” said Dr Benwell. “This uncertainty could mean some farmers turn away from greener options or give up on existing environmental choices, but as this week’s farmland bird index showed once again, there’s no time to lose in investing in a greener farming future.
“We urge Defra to publish more detail on higher environmental standards expected during and after the transition period as soon as possible, so that farmers can plan for the future.”
